Date: Feb 21, 2013 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 20 Feb., 20:57, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > > If as William as agreed to, d is nothing but every d_1, ..., d_n, then
> > > it is obvious that not every d_n can be exceeded.
> > All the d_n's can be exceeded as individuals. It is only the set of all
> > such individuals that cannot be exceeded.
> > --
> What distinguishes the set from the collection of all of its elements?
What distinguishes WM from a damned fool?
The same in both cases, nothing.