Date: Feb 21, 2013 3:36 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
<51d00148-5cfa-44b6-8bd5-17d80f55028a@r13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 20 Feb., 20:57, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>

> > > If as William as agreed to, d is nothing but every d_1, ..., d_n, then
> > > it is obvious that not every d_n can be exceeded.

> >
> > All the d_n's can be exceeded as individuals. It is only the set of all
> > such individuals that cannot be exceeded.
> > --

>
> What distinguishes the set from the collection of all of its elements?


What distinguishes WM from a damned fool?

The same in both cases, nothing.
--