Date: Feb 22, 2013 6:07 AM Author: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots On 22 Feb., 01:14, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > The statement is that the natural number does not exist between 1 and
> > n inclusively.
> I do not recall that that provision *between 1 and n* was included in
> the original.
It is included in the notion of potential infinity.