Date: Feb 23, 2013 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 23 Feb., 22:48, Nam Nguyen <namducngu...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> On 23/02/2013 2:38 PM, Virgil wrote:
> > In article
> > <f3b2ce4b-c9ec-447f-92b4-47a07a2e2...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>,
> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > In mathematics [...] proofs of existence do
> > not always require that one find an example of the thing claimed to
> > exist.
> So, how would one prove the existence of the infinite set of
> counter examples of Goldbach Conjecture, given that it does not
> "not [...] require that one find an example" of such existences?
It there was a logical necessity of a counter example, this necessity
was the proof. However, I don't see a necessity in this case. So I
have no proof.
But I see a logical necessity, that the sequence of all last digits of
the terms of a sequence like the following
1, 2, 3
does neither contain more digits neither less digits than there are
terms of the sequence.