Date: Feb 23, 2013 4:58 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 23 Feb., 22:48, Nam Nguyen <namducngu...@shaw.ca> wrote:

> On 23/02/2013 2:38 PM, Virgil wrote:

>

> > In article

> > <f3b2ce4b-c9ec-447f-92b4-47a07a2e2...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>,

> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > In mathematics [...] proofs of existence do

> > not always require that one find an example of the thing claimed to

> > exist.

>

> So, how would one prove the existence of the infinite set of

> counter examples of Goldbach Conjecture, given that it does not

> "not [...] require that one find an example" of such existences?

It there was a logical necessity of a counter example, this necessity

was the proof. However, I don't see a necessity in this case. So I

have no proof.

But I see a logical necessity, that the sequence of all last digits of

the terms of a sequence like the following

1

1, 2

1, 2, 3

...

does neither contain more digits neither less digits than there are

terms of the sequence.

Regards, WM