Date: Feb 23, 2013 6:34 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Feb 23, 5:18 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > Can you identify a FIS of d that is not in a line l of L?
> > You cannot. Nevertheless d consists of FIS of lines of L, and of
> > nothing else, by definition and by construction of d.
> > Or do you object to this fact?
> Why then are you raising the impression as if you were trying to argue
> that d is not with *all its existence* in the lines of the list?
I agree that d "with *all its existence*"
is in the lines of the list.
I do not agree that this means
d with all its existence is in
one line of the list.