Date: Feb 23, 2013 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 23 Feb., 22:48, Nam Nguyen <namducngu...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> > On 23/02/2013 2:38 PM, Virgil wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <f3b2ce4b-c9ec-447f-92b4-47a07a2e2...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>,
> > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > In mathematics [...] proofs of existence do
> > > not always require that one find an example of the thing claimed to
> > > exist.
> > So, how would one prove the existence of the infinite set of
> > counter examples of Goldbach Conjecture, given that it does not
> > "not [...] require that one find an example" of such existences?
> It there was a logical necessity of a counter example, this necessity
> was the proof. However, I don't see a necessity in this case. So I
> have no proof.
> But I see a logical necessity, that the sequence of all last digits of
> the terms of a sequence like the following
> 1, 2
> 1, 2, 3
> does neither contain more digits neither less digits than there are
> terms of the sequence.
> Regards, WM
The sequence of last digits can contain no more than ten different
digits which is less than the number of terms when there are more than