```Date: Feb 23, 2013 7:25 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article <2ad61b7b-0c53-443b-a941-80f8037cfdbd@k8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 23 Feb., 22:48, Nam Nguyen <namducngu...@shaw.ca> wrote:> > On 23/02/2013 2:38 PM, Virgil wrote:> >> > > In article> > > <f3b2ce4b-c9ec-447f-92b4-47a07a2e2...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>,> > >   WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> >> > > In mathematics [...] proofs of existence do> > > not always require that one find an example of the thing claimed to> > > exist.> >> > So, how would one prove the existence of the infinite set of> > counter examples of Goldbach Conjecture, given that it does not> > "not [...] require that one find an example" of such existences?> > It there was a logical necessity of a counter example, this necessity> was the proof. However, I don't see a necessity in this case. So I> have no proof.> > But I see a logical necessity, that the sequence of all last digits of> the terms of a sequence like the following> > 1> 1, 2> 1, 2, 3> ...> > does neither contain more digits neither less digits than there are> terms of the sequence.> > Regards, WMThe sequence of last digits can contain no more than ten different digits which is less than the number of terms when there are more than ten terms.--
```