Date: Feb 24, 2013 5:57 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 24 Feb., 00:34, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 23, 5:18 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > ======================
>
> > > Can you identify a FIS of d that is not in a line l of L?
>
> > No
>
> > > You cannot. Nevertheless d consists of FIS of lines of L, and of
> > > nothing else, by definition and by construction of d.
> > > Or do you object to this fact?

>
> > No.
>
> > ===============================
>
> > Why then are you raising the impression as if you were trying to argue
> > that d is not with *all its existence* in the lines of the list?

>
> I agree that d "with *all its existence*"
> is in the lines of the list.
> I do not agree that this means
> d with all its existence is in
> one line of the list.-


Remember: Potential infinity goes to every n, but not farther. And for
every n d with all its existence is in line n of the list.

Regards, WM