Date: Feb 25, 2013 6:13 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Feb 25, 11:37 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 25 Feb., 16:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We both agree
> > There does not exist an m
> > such that the mth line
> > of L is coFIS with the diagonal
> > (here we interpret "There does
> > not exist" to mean "we cannot find").
Do you now wish to withdraw this statement?
> > Indeed if we throw findable in
> > we agree about a lot of stuff.
> > There is no findable largest natural
> > number.
> > There is no ball with a findable index
> > in the vase.
> And there is no findable set of natural numbers
Well there is certainly a potentially infinite
set of findable natural numbers.
This potentially infinite set contains all the natural numbers
I need and use.