Date: Feb 27, 2013 3:28 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Feb 27, 8:21 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> Do you prefer your argument?

There is no disagreement over the facts.

We both agree that there is a natural number

valued function of time, m(t), such that

at any time t, m(t) is the index of an existing

line which contains all existing FIS of d.

We both agree that m(t) is not constant.

You think that describing this situation as

"there is a line which contains all FISs

of d"

is sensible.

I think that describing this situation as

"there is a line which contains all FISs

of d"

is idiotic.

I will not defend my position except to point

out that many others agree with me,

think that your claim

"there is a line which contains all FISs

of d"

means something else, and hence treat

you like an idiot for adhering to it.