Date: Feb 28, 2013 6:06 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 27 Feb., 21:50, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > Note, there is no "set |N" in potential infinity.
>
> If one can distinguish natural numbers from things which are not natural
> numbers WHY is there no set of all natural numbers


Because natural numbers like all numbers are names created by thinking
individuals. What has not been created is not there or somewhere else.

>
> Note that there is such a set everywhere else!


Note that people have believed in witches with the same faithfulness.
>
> > The
> > "set |N" is an actual, i.e., completed infinity. But this assumption
> > is contradicted (see below).

>
> Not outside of WMYTHEOLOGY !


In the list
1
1, 2
1, 2, 3
...
there is nothing unless it is in one single line.


>> Your LIST of lines is constructed so that there is no line containing
> all the elements in all the lines,

There is no "all" but thre is only "every". And there is every element
up to line n in line n. Your error is to fix a line and to look at the
elements in the lines beyond without looking at the lines beyond too.

Regards, WM