Date: Feb 28, 2013 5:12 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On Feb 28, 11:07 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 28 Feb., 20:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > Well, I was of the opinion we agree.  Looks like
> > I was wrong.   I misinterpreted

>
> > > we have
> > > a natural number valued function of time
> > > (or of the number of FISs of d that "actually
> > > exist", an increasing function of time)
> > > m(t).  It is trivial to see that there
> > > is an m(t) such that the "actually existing"
> > > line with index m(t), contains all
> > > "actually existing" FISs of d.

>
> > WM: Exactly!
>
> > I still do not understand why I cannot
> > take a simple natural number valued
> > function of time, say a(t) and set it
> > equal to m.

>

I am confused. Do you think that there is
an m(t) or not?