Date: Feb 28, 2013 5:12 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Feb 28, 11:07 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 28 Feb., 20:03, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> > Well, I was of the opinion we agree. Looks like

> > I was wrong. I misinterpreted

>

> > > we have

> > > a natural number valued function of time

> > > (or of the number of FISs of d that "actually

> > > exist", an increasing function of time)

> > > m(t). It is trivial to see that there

> > > is an m(t) such that the "actually existing"

> > > line with index m(t), contains all

> > > "actually existing" FISs of d.

>

> > WM: Exactly!

>

> > I still do not understand why I cannot

> > take a simple natural number valued

> > function of time, say a(t) and set it

> > equal to m.

>

I am confused. Do you think that there is

an m(t) or not?