```Date: Mar 1, 2013 2:02 PM
Author: Frederick Williams
Subject: Re: Matheology ? 222 Back to the roots

Nam Nguyen wrote:> > On 28/02/2013 8:27 AM, Frederick Williams wrote:> > Nam Nguyen wrote:> >>> >> On 27/02/2013 10:12 PM, Virgil wrote:> >>> In article <R8AXs.345282\$pV4.85998@newsfe21.iad>,> >> >>> The set of all functions from |N = {0,1,2,3,...} to {0,1,2,...,9} with> >>> each f interpreted as Sum _(i in |N) f(i)/10^1, defines such a> >>> structure..> >>> >> That doesn't look like a structure to me. Could you put all what> >> you've said above into a form using the notations of a structure?> >> > There is a set and a collection of functions on it.  How does it fail to> > be a structure?> >  From what textbook did you learn that a structure is defined as> "a set and a collection of functions on it"?None, so far as I know.  Look, 2 + 2 = 4 is a fact but I know of notextbook which defines '+' as that function which adds 2 to itself andgives the result 4.-- When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.Jonathan Swift: Thoughts on Various Subjects, Moral and Diverting
```