Date: Mar 1, 2013 3:45 PM
Author: David Bostwick
Subject: Re: Google Groups isn't Wikipedia, so it's not indexed as if it were.

Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote in
news:ef35eb9b-2d7a-44b5-a39c-9cc4db94b561@f6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:

> On Feb 28, 1:42 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:
>>   Google Groups is 100% uncensored, so it isn't fully indexed. Were
> Google Groups fully indexed, it'd be used to game the system; i.e.
> people would use it to push up the ranking of certain web sites. Large
> (sub)threads with lots of authors are more likely to be real; i.e.
> posts with lots of good replies are more likely to be indexed. Google
> Groups isn't Wikipedia, so it's not indexed as if it were.
>
> Sounds like a lot of double-speak, and I would hazard to guess
> that Jeff is a employee of Google, perhaps overseeing the blocked
> from view of 2,000 of Archimedes Plutonium's posts since May of 2012.
>


Ah, a conspiracy.