Date: Mar 1, 2013 4:39 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
In article

<a944da49-8c9b-4e29-a863-63ac515b0a12@w14g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 28 Feb., 23:40, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Feb 28, 11:29 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >

> > > I think that there is a variable maximum or limit that depends (among

> > > others) on t.

> >

> > So what did the statement

> >

> > There is no m(t).

> >

> > mean?

>

> We cannot fix it in the sense required for "there is" of current

> mathematics.

That WM cannot do something is hardly proof that something cannot be

done, just as his claiming to do things is hardly proof that they can be

done.

For example, WM has claimed to have a linear mapping from the

not-a-linear-space unit interval in binary to the not-a-linear-space set

of all paths in a Complete Infinite Binary Tree.

While bijective functions between then do exist, no linear function can

exist until both of those sets are provided with linear space

structures, which as mere sets they do not currently have.

--