Date: Mar 2, 2013 2:00 PM
Author: Ralf Bader
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
> On 2 Mrz., 17:18, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 2, 1:17 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>> > On 1 Mrz., 23:51, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > The argument is not only time.
>> > > m can change even though the time does not ?
>> > The maximum depends on the personal environment, the capability to
>> > abbreviate numbers, the wish to do so, and many more factors. It
>> > invents relativity into mathematics.
>> Oh so m is not only an unfindable, variable
>> natural number. Everyone has their own
>> personal m.
> Of course. Imagine a world without intelligence. What would be that
> largest number? What would be a number?
> In relativity no spacetime without energy/mass.
> In MatheRealism no numbers without intelligent beings.
So there are no numbers in "MatheRealism". If you would have said this some
ten years ago it would have saved us a lot of ado.