```Date: Mar 2, 2013 9:51 PM
Author: Graham Cooper
Subject: Re: Cantor's Faulty Induction Method

On Mar 3, 11:48 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:> On Mar 2, 3:54 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > Given a part of a LIST 3X3 digits>> > LIST DUMP> > 0.223> > 0.443> > 0.776>> > An AD Function Exists that calculates a Missing Real 3 digits long>> You've got your TENSES backwards.> This anti-diagonal function exists EVEN IF YOU ARE *NOT* given a 3x3> list of> digits.  The anti-diagonal function can operate on ANY list of lists> with the property> that its nth "row"-list  is at least n digits "wide" (long).  For ANY,> EVERY, EACH, or ALL n.> 3 simply has nothing to do with it.> And the list does not have to have a last element, either.> The function also operates correctly on lists that are infinitely> long  -- in those cases,> the result it returns is also infinitely long -- provided that every> row-element-list on the> big list is only finitely many rows away from the top.  I.e., provided> that every row on the> list is the nth row for some natural n.>I DON'T CARE WHAT YOUR OPINIONS AREWHEN I POST A PROOF!YOU SAY YES OR NO 1STBY INDUCTIONALL(n) ALL(LIST of SIZE n)E(real)  real =/= any row of LIST-----------WORK ON *THIS* PROOF BY INDUCTIONTHE THREADS TOPICTHEN MAYBE, MAYBE ONE DAY YOU'LL SEE YOUR ERROR!(As if you could ever comprehend infinite Union of an infinitelist...)Herc
```