Date: Mar 2, 2013 9:51 PM
Author: Graham Cooper
Subject: Re: Cantor's Faulty Induction Method
On Mar 3, 11:48 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:

> On Mar 2, 3:54 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > Given a part of a LIST 3X3 digits

>

> > LIST DUMP

> > 0.223

> > 0.443

> > 0.776

>

> > An AD Function Exists that calculates a Missing Real 3 digits long

>

> You've got your TENSES backwards.

> This anti-diagonal function exists EVEN IF YOU ARE *NOT* given a 3x3

> list of

> digits. The anti-diagonal function can operate on ANY list of lists

> with the property

> that its nth "row"-list is at least n digits "wide" (long). For ANY,

> EVERY, EACH, or ALL n.

> 3 simply has nothing to do with it.

> And the list does not have to have a last element, either.

> The function also operates correctly on lists that are infinitely

> long -- in those cases,

> the result it returns is also infinitely long -- provided that every

> row-element-list on the

> big list is only finitely many rows away from the top. I.e., provided

> that every row on the

> list is the nth row for some natural n.

>

I DON'T CARE WHAT YOUR OPINIONS ARE

WHEN I POST A PROOF!

YOU SAY YES OR NO 1ST

BY INDUCTION

ALL(n) ALL(LIST of SIZE n)

E(real) real =/= any row of LIST

-----------

WORK ON *THIS* PROOF BY INDUCTION

THE THREADS TOPIC

THEN MAYBE, MAYBE ONE DAY YOU'LL SEE YOUR ERROR!

(As if you could ever comprehend infinite Union of an infinite

list...)

Herc