Date: Mar 3, 2013 5:35 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Mar 3, 10:56 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 3 Mrz., 17:36, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > On Mar 3, 12:41 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > Why don't you simply try to find a potentially infinity set of natural

> > > numbers (i.e. excluding matheological dogmas like "all prime numbers"

> > > or "all even numbers") that is not in one single line?

>

> > the potentially infinite set of every natural number

> is always finite - up to every natural number.

> If you don't like that

> recognition, try to name a number that does not belong to a FISON.

> This set is always in one line. You should understand that every

> number is in and hence every FISON is a line of the list.

Indeed, but the question is whether there is one single line of the

list that contains every FISON. We know that such a line

cannot be findable. There is the unfindable, variable,

a different one for each person, line l_m. However, calling

l_m "one single line of the list" is silly.