```Date: Mar 4, 2013 5:56 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On Mar 4, 6:57 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 3 Mrz., 23:35, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>>>>>>>>>> > On Mar 3, 10:56 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:>> > > On 3 Mrz., 17:36, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:>> > > > On Mar 3, 12:41 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:>> > > > > Why don't you simply try to find a potentially infinity set of natural> > > > > numbers (i.e. excluding matheological dogmas like "all prime numbers"> > > > > or "all even numbers") that is not in one single line?>> > > >   the potentially infinite set of every natural number> > > is always finite - up to every natural number.> > > If you don't like that> > > recognition, try to name a number that does not belong to a FISON.> > > This set is always in one line. You should understand that every> > > number is in and hence every FISON is a line of the list.>> > Indeed, but the question is whether there is one single line of the> > list that contains every FISON.  We know that such a line> > cannot be findable.  There is the unfindable, variable,> > a different one for each person, line l_m.  However, calling> > l_m "one single line of the list" is silly.>> On the other hand, you claim     Let K be a (possibly potentially infinite) set oflines of L. Then     Every FISON of d is in a findable line of K     iff K does not have a findable last lineWM's claim: sillyWH's claim: not silly
```