Date: Mar 5, 2013 6:45 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Mar 5, 10:57 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 4 Mrz., 23:56, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Let K be a (possibly potentially infinite) set of
> > lines of L. Then
> > Every FISON of d is in a findable line of K
> > iff K does not have a findable last line
> No, false quote.
What do you think this was a quote of?
This is my claim, put into the language we
have now developed.
>Every findable FIS of d is in a findable line of L
Clearly, The question is: "For what subsets of lines
of L is this still true?" Hence the condition
> > WM's claim: silly
> Only for those who deny the possibility of identity for potentially
> infinite sets.
The claim the unfindable, variable, different for each person l_m
is "one single line" of L is still silly even if you allow
identity for potentially infinite sets.