Date: Mar 5, 2013 6:45 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Mar 5, 10:57 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 4 Mrz., 23:56, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Let K be a (possibly potentially infinite) set of

> > lines of L. Then

>

> > Every FISON of d is in a findable line of K

> > iff K does not have a findable last line

>

> No, false quote.

What do you think this was a quote of?

This is my claim, put into the language we

have now developed.

>Every findable FIS of d is in a findable line of L

Clearly, The question is: "For what subsets of lines

of L is this still true?" Hence the condition

on K

<snip>

>

> > WM's claim: silly

>

> Only for those who deny the possibility of identity for potentially

> infinite sets.

The claim the unfindable, variable, different for each person l_m

is "one single line" of L is still silly even if you allow

identity for potentially infinite sets.