Date: Mar 5, 2013 4:27 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots
In article

<f22cc69b-9e52-486a-a707-5ebfd5964474@r8g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 5 Mrz., 00:52, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > In article

> > <c89172cd-244c-4612-b473-b2a402542...@g8g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,

> >

> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> > > On 3 Mrz., 23:47, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> >

> > > > While what is contained in any set of lines WHICH HAS A LAST LINE is

> > > > contained in that last line, when one is outside of Wolkenmuekenheim,

> > > > MOST sets of lines do not have a last line, and no such set has all

> > > > members of all its lines in any one line.

> >

> > > It is not a matter of a last line. It is enough that every line

> > > contains all that its predecessors contain. This shows that there is

> > > never more than one line required to contain all preceding lines.

> >

> > But that does not meant that any one line can contain all lines, at

> > least not unless there is a last line.

>

> The list is constructed such that never more than one line is

> containing all elements.

If the list is complete, then never even one line contains al elements,

and if not complete then not the set of all lines.

> This holds for every FIS of the list

But never for the list itself.

Or does WM claim that some FIS is the list itself, and not have a

successor FIS?

--