Date: Mar 6, 2013 6:48 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 6 Mrz., 12:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > L_m is a single line if m is a natural number.

> > Would you prefer to call L_m infinitely many lines?

>

> Nope, I would prefer to call L_m a function

> (of time and person). A function may have as

> value a "single line of the list"

> but calling something that changes a "single line of the

> list" is silly.-

I said always that L_m is a function (of several arguments) and that

this function takes as vaules lines of the list. As it takes single

lines, I don't see why we should not call them single lines. But that

is only a quarrel about word. Nevertheless, you have not yet answered

the more important question. Is there a particular reason? Remember,

not long ago you claimed that potential infinity as well as actual

infinity would yield the same results.

Regards, WM