Date: Mar 6, 2013 1:08 AM
Author: GS Chandy
Subject: Re: Why schools used to be better
Lou Talman posted Mar 2, 2013 10:34 PM:
> Because so few humans undertake any endeavors.
I do, I think, understand the sense in which you make this assertion - but: I believe that (at least in a simplistic way) we're all performing lesser or greater 'endeavors' all the time (in some way or another):
- -- Every day, we get up; perform ablutions; do various other things, from getting breakfast to working on a whole number of small objectives (endeavors).
- -- Every human being is always *endeavoring to do something or the other* all through his/her life - and so is every group of human beings. (Not that the individuals or groups are actually endeavoring to do worthwhile things; or performing their endeavors effectively).
The rest of Lou Talman's response appears below:
> On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:46:02 -0700, Robert Hansen
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 2013, at 2:52 PM, Louis Talman
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> Here I must disagree. Mathematics has been, is,
> and will remain,
> >> central to human endeavor; it is one of only two
> >>effective tools we
> >> have for manipulating ideas.
> > How can something be "central to human endeavor" if
> so few humans posses
> > the ability?
> > Bob Hansen
> --Louis A. Talman
> Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
> Metropolitan State University of Denver
Message was edited by: GS Chandy