Date: Mar 7, 2013 3:39 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 7 Mrz., 12:49, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 7, 12:39 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> > On 7 Mrz., 11:35, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > On Mar 7, 11:12 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > > On 6 Mrz., 23:48, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > > On Mar 6, 7:44 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > > > > On 6 Mrz., 13:18, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > > <snip>

>

> > > > > > > A subset K of the lines of L

> > > > > > > contains every FIS of d iff

> > > > > > > K has no findable last line.

>

> > > > > > No

>

> > > > > Let G be a subset of the lines of L

> > > > > with a findable last line. Call

> > > > > this line g.

>

> > > Note According to WM

>

> > > There does not exist

> > > (in the sense of not findable)

> > > a natural number m such that

> > > the mth line of L is coFIS with

> > > d

>

> Please answer the question

>

> Do you agree with the statement

>

> g is not coFIS with d.

That depends on the state of d.

To talk of d without further specification is silly. Didn't you wish

to be not silly?

Regards, WM