Date: Mar 7, 2013 3:39 PM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On 7 Mrz., 12:49, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 12:39 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> > On 7 Mrz., 11:35, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 7, 11:12 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > > On 6 Mrz., 23:48, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Mar 6, 7:44 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 6 Mrz., 13:18, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > <snip>
>
> > > > > > >    A subset K of the lines of L
> > > > > > >    contains every FIS of d iff
> > > > > > >    K has no findable last line.

>
> > > > > > No
>
> > > > > Let G be a subset of the lines of L
> > > > > with a findable last line.  Call
> > > > > this line g.

>
> > > Note  According to WM
>
> > > There does not exist
> > > (in the sense of not findable)
> > > a natural number m such that
> > > the mth line of L is coFIS with
> > > d

>
> Please answer the question
>
> Do you agree with the statement
>
>      g is not coFIS with d.


That depends on the state of d.

To talk of d without further specification is silly. Didn't you wish
to be not silly?

Regards, WM