Date: Mar 7, 2013 4:00 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
WM <> wrote:

> On 6 Mrz., 23:40, William Hughes <> wrote:
> > WM: I said always that L_m is a function
> >
> > WM: L_m is a single line.

> (L_m) is a fuction.
> L_m is a single line.
> Are you really unable to understand?
> Regards, WM

To understand what goes on in Wolkenmuekenheim, everyone but WM is

And where is WM's alleged proof that some function from the set of all
binary sequences to the set of all paths of a CIBT is a linearfunction?

WM several times claimed it but cannot seem to prove it, at least not by
any argument valid outside Wolkenmuekenheim.

So WM should either withdraw his claim or find a proof valid outside