Date: Mar 7, 2013 7:03 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
<4f85d5e0-5e24-4431-86ed-97fb68989a51@a14g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>,
William Hughes <wpihughes@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 7, 9:39 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
>

> > To talk of d without further specification is silly.
>
>
> WM: There does not exist
> (in the sense of not findable)
> a natural number m such that
> the mth line of L is coFIS with
> d
>
> No mention of the state of d. So I guess
> we can talk of whether d is coFIS with
> a line without mentioning
> the state of d.
>
> Do you agree with the statement
>
>      g is not coFIS with d.
>
> ?


If it makes sense outside of Wolkenmuekenheim, WM will not agree with it.
--