```Date: Mar 8, 2013 4:23 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article <70c8b555-6050-40c8-a30b-9d9878f142b5@hq4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 8 Mrz., 12:29, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> > On Mar 8, 12:16 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> >> > > On 8 Mrz., 11:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:> >> > > To make a change:> >> > Please answer the question> >> > > Do *you* agree with the statement: It is silly to> > > claim the existence of a set of natural numbers that has no first> > > element?> >> > <outside of Wokenmekenheim>> > Where is Worker's meken?In Wolkenmuekenheim > >> > Given the standard ordering, it makes sense> > to claim the existence of a  set of natural numbers that has no> > last element but it does not make sense> > to claim the existence of a (non-empty)> > Very important remark! Thank you.> > > set of natural numbers that> > has no> > first element> > Very good. I see, we agree completely. Would you be so kind to inform> Virgil of this surprising fact? For some unknown reasons he does not> believe in my words and in logic.Since I have already posted that only the empty set of naturals can be without a first element, WM's false implication that I did not know it is refuted!> > And I have a second question:> > The set of FISONs that do not contain the set |N of all natural> numbers, in its natural order, has a first element {1}, a second> element {1, 2}, but no last element.>  > Can a bunch of infinitely many incapables be capable?Any and every infinite set of FIS's of d, each FIS alone, or finite set of FISs, incapable of covering d, covers d.It is a shame that something so simple and transparent in standard mathematics remains so convoluted and opaque in Wolkenmuekenheim .> For instance, can an infinite sequence of positive numbers between 0> and 1 have the limit 100?  Only in Wolkenmuekenheim! And where is WM's proof that some mapping from the set of all binary sequences to the set of all paths of a CIBT is a linear mapping?WM several times claimed it but cannot seem to prove it.--
```