Date: Mar 9, 2013 4:07 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 222 Back to the roots

In article 
<8fb4f141-b7bf-4725-93dd-a50a2b7134a0@z4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>,
William Hughes <wpihughes@gmail.com> wrote:

> So this is WM's explanation.
>
>
> When he says
>
> No findable line of L is coFIS
> with d
>
> and
>
> g is coFIS with d
>
> he is not using the same d.
>
>
> d like L_m is changable.
>
> So let us use (d) to indicate the function.
> The function (d) is not changable, though
> its value may be.
>
> Do you agree with the statement
>
> g is not coFIS with (d)


You are hoping to get WM to be logical.

A forlorn hope!
--