Date: Mar 9, 2013 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On 9 Mrz., 21:07, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > Of course the lines
> > from 1 to n are completely irrelevant.
> There is no way to have a line n+1 without having lines 1 to n preceding
> it, so that no line is irrelevant in determining the position of the
> lines following it.
Wrong. Here is a set that starts at line 4
Only the last line is sufficient and necessary to contain the first
dozen natural numbers.