```Date: Mar 13, 2013 12:59 PM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots

On Mar 13, 5:37 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 13 Mrz., 13:19, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:<snip>> > If you wish to contest this, use my words not> > yours  (e.g.  I have never said "The list contains more> > numbers than fit into a single line",  I have said> > "There is no line in the list which contains every> > number in the list".)>> Correct. The list has more numbers than a single line has. Since every> number that is in the list, must be in at least one line, this implies> that the numbers are in more than one line.To be precise, a set of lines, say K, that contains all the numberscontains at least two lines.   However, this does *not* imply thatthere are two numbers that are not in a single line.Nor does it imply that there is a necessary line in K.Note that a sufficient set does not imply a necessary lineeven in potential infinity.  There is no line that is neededto make L have an unfindable last line.
```