Date: Mar 15, 2013 8:56 AM
Author: William Hughes
Subject: Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
On Mar 14, 10:31 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 14 Mrz., 08:39, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> > On Mar 13, 11:05 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

> > > On 13 Mrz., 22:41, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> > > > Let J be a set of the lines of L with no

> > > > findable last line. At least two lines

> > > > belong to J. Are any lines of J necessary?

>

> > > Remove all lines.

> > > Can any numbers remain in the list? No.

> > > Therefore at least one line must remain in the list.

>

> > > We do not know which it is, but it is more than no line.

> > > In other words, it is necessary, that one line remains.

>

> > However, it is not necessary that any one particular

> > line remain. So while it is necessary that the set

> > J contain one line, there is no particular line l that is

> > necessary.

>

> Correct. But I have not claimed that there are particular lines.

Then it is a mistake to call particular line necessary

e.g. to say "There is a necessary line".