Date: Mar 16, 2013 6:33 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224
In article

<54c7bd7a-5812-42a2-b052-2d41a8e23041@g8g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 16 Mrz., 20:46, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

>

> > > > A positive finite number of lines in necessary

> >

> > > A positive finite number of lines contains a least element.

> >

> > True, but irrelevant to the issue of a set of lines covering d.

>

> The lines ofthe set have numbers. These numbers can be unioned into a

> set of natural numbers. This set has a least element! But we cannot

> find it, because Virgil calls it "irrelevant".

WM may not be able to find it but anyone with a brain can, it is the

first natural number, 0 or 1 depending on which model one uses, which is

in EVERY non-empty union of lines.

> >

> >

> >

> > > > We have the choice between 1 line (in potential

> >

> > > > > infinity) and 0 lines (in actual infinity).

> >

> > > > Is that a Royal "We"?

> >

> > > No it includes evlerybody, many don't know though.

But as it only holds in Wolkenmuekenheim and nowhere els, it does not

include everybody, but only those, like WM, entombed in

Wolkenmuekenheim.

> >

> > So that WM claims that in WMytheology, 1 line covers d but everywhere

> > else 0 lines cover d?

>

> No

Finally WM got something right!

> >

> > ***********************************************************************

> >

> > WM has frequently claimed that a mapping from the set of all infinite

> > binary sequences to the set of paths of a CIBT is a linear mapping.

>

> Proven in Matheology § 226.

Not to the satisfaction of anyone outside Wolkenmuekenheim.

WM has not shown that either of the sets has the form of a linear space

nor that the mapping between them is, besides a bijection, also a linear

mapping.

There is a way to do it but not at all the way WM has claimed.

And not a way that WM is mathematician enough to find on his own.

--