```Date: Mar 16, 2013 6:33 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article <54c7bd7a-5812-42a2-b052-2d41a8e23041@g8g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 16 Mrz., 20:46, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:> > > > > A positive finite number of lines in necessary> >> > > A positive finite number of lines contains a least element.> >> > True, but irrelevant to the issue of a set of lines covering d.> > The lines ofthe set have numbers. These numbers can be unioned into a> set of natural numbers. This set has a least element! But we cannot> find it, because Virgil calls it "irrelevant".WM may not be able to find it but anyone with a brain can, it is the first natural number, 0 or 1 depending on which model one uses, which is in EVERY non-empty union of lines.> >> >> >> > > > We have the choice between 1 line (in potential> >> > > > > infinity) and 0 lines (in actual infinity).> >> > > > Is that a Royal "We"?> >> > > No it includes evlerybody, many don't know though.But as it only holds in Wolkenmuekenheim and nowhere els, it does not include everybody, but only those, like WM,  entombed in Wolkenmuekenheim. > >> > So that WM claims that in WMytheology, 1 line covers d but everywhere> > else 0 lines cover d?> > NoFinally WM got something right!> >> > ***********************************************************************> >> > WM has frequently claimed that a mapping from the set of all infinite> > binary sequences to the set of paths of a CIBT is a linear mapping.> > Proven in Matheology § 226. Not to the satisfaction of anyone outside Wolkenmuekenheim. WM has not shown that either of the sets has the form of a linear space nor that the mapping between them is, besides a bijection, also a linear mapping. There is a way to do it but not at all the way WM has claimed. And not a way that WM is mathematician enough to find on his own.--
```