Date: Mar 17, 2013 1:39 AM Author: Koobee Wublee Subject: Re: Relativity in terms of False Premises On Mar 16, 6:08 am, Wayne Callahan <wca...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Among many others, relativity is based on the following weird premise:

>

> 1. The METER [M] determines the SPEED of LIGHT [SoL]

> 2. The SPEED of LIGHT [SoL] determines the METER [M]

>

> Obviously, those are indefinite recursive function, with no start nor end.

>

> Any comments?

You got SR all wrong. SR is not about the definition of the speed of

light in that circular understanding you have pointed out. SR is the

interpretation on the real world to the Lorentz transform and nothing

else. <shrug>

If one reverse-engineered the Lorentz transform, there are two

assumptions that this mathematical model is built out of. These two

guesses, glorified as intelligent and educated guesses called

postulates, are what foundation of SR is in the first place. The

first assumption is the principle of relativity which has never been

verified without any circular references similar to the one you have

raised. The second assumption on the constancy of the speed of light

is a suggestion of Voigt who saw wisely as a necessary requirement to

satisfy the null results of the MMX, and that took place in 1887. The

self-styled physicists have never given credits to Voigt for that

instead they gave it to the fvckwit they have worshipped --- Einstein

the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. Why is that? Because the

principle of relativity was already characterized by Galileo at least

three bloody centuries before. They had to credit their demi-god with

something that the fvckwit never had originally come up with. It is

all in history. <shrug>

Before the Lorentz transform, there was Larmor?s transform which along

with the Voigt transform was one of the infinite many that satisfy the

null results of the MMX. As a consequence, they also satisfy the

second postulate of SR --- the constancy in the speed of light --- but

not the first one --- the principle of relativity. <shrug>

All these transforms --- the Voigt, Larmor?s, the other infinite

numbers, and the good old Galilean transform --- are tales of three

points --- two observers observing the same observed. Each transform

merely relates how the two observers observe the same observed --- the

same event as observed by two observers. In particular, these non-

Galilean type transforms including Larmor?s transform say the Aether

must exist since they all reference any observations back to the

absolute frame of reference. It turns out that if these two observers

are moving in parallel to each against the stationary background of

the absolute frame of reference, any reference to the absolute frame

of reference would disappear in the mathematics. In doing so, the

Lorentz transform is born where the Lorentz transform only is valid in

this very special circumstance. Extending the law of physics

occurring in this very special circumstance to the rest and general

case, the Lorentz transform is born. Thus, it is totally fvcked up in

the first place. <shrug>

Koobee Wublee seems to be the only one who has realized this

mathematical error after more than a hundred years. Well, it is very

lonely at the top indeed. Does that mean Koobee Wublee believes in

Larmor?s transform? Well, all these transforms discovered by Lorentz,

including the Voigt, and Larmor?s transforms, that satisfy the null

results of the MMX manifest some and varying degrees of time

contradictions. The most severe case is the twin?s paradox manifested

by the Lorentz transform. Thus, they cannot be valid. <shrug>

The only transform left is the Galilean transform interpreting light

as classical particles with non-zero rest mass. This means the

ballistic theory of light which actually explains quite well on the

null results of the MMX. However, the hypothesis completely rejects

all the works put together so far in electromagnetism, and this is a

more serious flaw. <shrug>

Thus, what the self-styled physicists are so confident in is actually

very seriously flawed. The truth is still out there. Koobee Wublee

personally thinks electromagnetism has to be modified along with the

Galilean transform in order to cope with the reality in the null

results of the MMX and wavelight nature in light --- the very

existence of the Aether. <shrug>

Koobee Wublee is impartial to the Aether, but all the experimental

results seem to point to the very existence of the Aether as the best

course tested with rigorous scientific methodologies. Any serious

scientist must not downplay any experimental results properly

interpreted so. So, what is Koobee Wublee missing? <shrug>