Date: Mar 18, 2013 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 18 Mrz., 00:59, Virgil <> wrote:

> Why does WM claim that after what WM calls "Cantor's list" has been
> diagonalized, he can include all anti-diagonals, when it is always
> possible to find others that have been so far overlooked?

This simply and exactly shows that it is inconsistent to assume one of
both powers to be stronger.

Every list yields another diagonal.
And every diagonal can be included in another list.

Both these facts are the two sides of infinity. Cantor did that false
step to choose one as more justified than the other.

Regards, WM