Date: Mar 18, 2013 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/18/2013 7:03 AM, WM wrote:
> On 18 Mrz., 06:28, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> It has been done already long ago (see Matheology § 226).
> The isomorphism is from |R,+,* to |R,+,*. Only in one case the
> elements of |R are written as binary sequences and the other time as
> paths of the Binary Tree. Virgil is simply too stupid to understand
It has not been done at all.
You may perform the requested task according to
the standard definitions used in mathematics
or you may propose new definitions to be
considered and *agreed* upon.
You have done neither.