```Date: Mar 18, 2013 6:21 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article <b3e95ba2-5b9a-4f05-89b2-ea432e569c9c@gp5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:> On 18 Mrz., 00:30, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:> > > > I do not force anybody to accept my model.> >> > For that to make any sense whatsoever,> > you need to define for us what you> > mean by "model" since you reject the> > standard mathematics by which that term> > is used.> > The word model may be used in some sciences including mathematics.> That does not force me to do anything.Something seems to force WM to make an ass of himself with remarkable frequency.> The isomorphism is from |R,+,* to |R,+,*. Only in one case the> elements of |R are written as binary sequences and the other time as> paths of the Binary Tree. Virgil is simply too stupid to understand> that.There are several flaws in WM's claim that the identity map on |R induces a linear map on {0,1}^|N, the set of all binary sequences.  WM's flaws in making that claim work include, but are not necessarily limited to:(1) not all members of |R will have any such binary expansions,  only those between 0 and 1, so that not all sums of vectors will "add up" to be vectors within his alleged linear space, and (2) some reals (the positive binary rationals strictly between 0 and 1) will have two distinct and unequal-as-vectors representations, requiring that some real numbers not be equal to themselves as a vectors, and(3) WM's method does not provide for the negatives of any of the vectors that he can form.On the basis of the above problems, and possibly others as well that I have not yet even thought of, I challenge WM's claim to have represented the set |R as the set of all binary sequences, much less to have imbued that set of all binary sequences with the structure of a real vector space or the showed the identity mapping to be a linear mapping on his set of "vectors".--
```