Date: Mar 18, 2013 6:29 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224
In article

<02b6c3ee-e9d2-45dc-b790-bbd16e31b318@fn10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 17 Mrz., 23:05, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Mar 17, 10:49 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> >

> > > On 17 Mrz., 22:39, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > You say that if a set of lines contains an unfindable

> > > > line it is necessary that there are

> > > > two findable lines.

> >

> > > No.

> >

> > Oh, so there can be a set of lines that contains an unfindable

> > line but not two findable lines ?!?

>

> When you remove every line as soon as you have found it, then no

> findable line remains. Isn't that obvious?

Why remove it so rapidly. Hold off at least until it has been proved

unneccessary by the finding of another line.

>

> However this might not be interesting for the majority of readers.

> Much more interesting will be how the case of actual infinity can be

> explained without contradicting the construction principle of our well-

> known list.

Such monstrosities as WM creates are only well known in

Wolkenmuekenheim.

> The isomorphism is from |R,+,* to |R,+,*. Only in one case the

> elements of |R are written as binary sequences and the other time as

> paths of the Binary Tree. Virgil is simply too stupid to understand

> that.everal flaws in WM's claim that the identity map on induces a linear map on 2^|N.

WM's flaws in making that claim work include, but are not necessarily

limited to:

(1) not all members of |R will have any such binary expansions, only

those between 0 and 1, so that not all sums of vectors will "add up" to

be vectors within his alleged linear space, and

(2) some reals (the positive binary rationals strictly between 0 and 1)

will have two distinct and unequal-as-vectors representations, requiring

that some real numbers not be equal to themselves as a vectors, and

(3) WM's method does not provide for the negatives of any of the vectors

that he can form.

On the basis of the above problems, and possibly others as well that I

have not yet even thought of, I challenge WM's claim to have represented

the set |R as the set of all binary sequences, much less to have imbued

that set of all binary sequences with the structure of a real vector

space or the showed the identity mapping to be a linear mapping on his

set of "vectors".

--