Date: Mar 20, 2013 12:20 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/20/2013 11:18 AM, YBM wrote:
> Proof, in the Mückenheim way, that an dog with no legs has two legs.
>
> Prop 1. No leg is necessary in order for a dog to have more than two
> legs.
>
> Proof :
> the right front leg is not necessary as you can remove it and the dog
> still has more than two legs
> the left front leg is not necessary as you can remove it and the dog
> still has more than two legs
> the right back leg is not necessary as you can remove it and the dog
> still has more than two legs
> the left back leg is not necessary as you can remove it and the dog
> still has more than two legs
>
> Corrolary 1:
> Even if you remove all legs to a dog, the dog still have more than
> two legs.
>
> Corrolary 2:
> The concept of quadrupede is absurd.
>
>


Provided it has an unfindable tail....