Date: Mar 20, 2013 12:35 PM Author: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Matheology § 224 On 20 Mrz., 17:18, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote:
> Proof, in the Mückenheim way, that an dog with no legs has two legs.
It is a pity that you have no idea of what set-inclusion means. But I
am not surprised.