Date: Mar 20, 2013 12:42 PM Author: YBM Subject: Re: Matheology § 224 Le 20/03/2013 17:35, WM a écrit :
> On 20 Mrz., 17:18, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote:
>> Proof, in the Mückenheim way, that an dog with no legs has two legs.
> It is a pity that you have no idea of what set-inclusion means. But I
> am not surprised.
The pity is that you do not recognize you OWN way of "prooving"
statement when you are in face of it.