Date: Mar 20, 2013 5:07 PM Author: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: Matheology § 224 On 20 Mrz., 22:01, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> Indeed, you have not even given an explanation
> of *all* that is agreed upon.
If you don't know the set theoretic meaning of "all natural numbers",
then you should try to learn it. If you don't know the meaning of
Cantor's "wohlunterscheidbar" (well-distinguishable) that has to be
true for all elements of every set, then you should try to learn it.