Date: Mar 20, 2013 5:10 PM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/20/2013 11:42 AM, YBM wrote:
> Le 20/03/2013 17:35, WM a écrit :
>> On 20 Mrz., 17:18, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote:
>>> Proof, in the Mückenheim way, that an dog with no legs has two legs.
>>
>> It is a pity that you have no idea of what set-inclusion means. But I
>> am not surprised.

>
> The pity is that you do not recognize you OWN way of "prooving"
> statement when you are in face of it.
>


He cannot.

"Proof by reality" is not based upon
even his own methods.