Date: Mar 20, 2013 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/20/2013 12:03 PM, WM wrote:
> On 20 Mrz., 17:42, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote:
>> Le 20/03/2013 17:35, WM a écrit :
>>> On 20 Mrz., 17:18, YBM <ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Proof, in the Mückenheim way, that an dog with no legs has two legs.
>>> It is a pity that you have no idea of what set-inclusion means. But I
>>> am not surprised.
>> The pity is that you do not recognize you OWN way of "prooving"
>> statement when you are in face of it.
> I did it my way.
> I'll state my case of which I'm certain.
As for that of which you are certain...
As for the "stating of cases", you have done
no such thing.
As soon as someone confronted your statements
in a direct and sophisticated manner, you run
Now in addition to playing with crayons,you show
your ability for hide and seek.
We await the making of your case. You have your
readers to think about -- you know, the believers
in falsifiability, empirical foundations, and