Date: Mar 20, 2013 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/20/2013 3:10 PM, WM wrote:
> On 20 Mrz., 20:04, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
>>> Corrolary 2:
>>> The concept of quadrupede is absurd.
>> You have WM's style of argument down pat!
> Another brilliant expert!
> Now you can start to recite: When shall we three meet again.
> On a more humorous note, your explanation of
> quantifiers has been shown to lead to a
> proof of an infinite unity.
> >>>> Either you know that, or you don't. If not, then it is not my
> >>>> teach you.
> >>> You disappoint.
> >>> You have often -- and explicitly -- stated that
> >>> you have come here to teach me.
> >> Did I??? I had come to you? Not as fas as I know.
> >> Nevertheless: Sometimes even I have to confess that I have failed.
> > Providing opportunity to poor ignorant
> > souls is never a failure.
> > It may be that my statement above had
> > been in error. I understood your many
> > threads as directed to the conversion of
> > *all* those mortal beings you label as
> > heathens.
> > I merely included myself. It seemed
> > reasonable as we only know of finitely
> > many mortal beings, and, you claim that
> > to be a criterion for deciding quantification.
> > If you are ascribing some other qualification,
> > here is the logic:
> > All mortal beings are finite.
> > fom is not a mortal being.
> > =============================
> > fom is infinite.
> > Do you care to amend the logic of your implied
> > reasoning?
> You have been asked a question.
> Instead of answering,...
> ...you post more nonsense.
> And you actually had the audacity to suggest
> that the parrot learn to think for himself.