Date: Mar 20, 2013 5:32 PM
Author: Ralf Bader
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

WM wrote:

> On 20 Mrz., 22:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 20, 10:01 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>>

>> > It cannot contain a necessary line, since, as you said, there is no
>> > necessary line.
>> > But you think that it necessarily must contain a not necessary line.

>>
>> Correct. However, this not necessary line can be any line.
>>

>> > If so, then at least one line is necessary.
>>
>> No, knowing that you need one line does not mean you need
>> one particular line.

>
> You cannot know that you need one line, because every chice can be
> disproved.

>>
>> <snip>
>>

>> > > A set of needed lines exists.
>>
>> > Name the first line.
>>
>> One set of needed lines that exists is line 2,3,4,6,7,8...
>> The first line is 2.

>
> This set is not a set of needed lines, because 2, 3, and all lines you
> mentioned are not needed lines.
>
> Would you call the set 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ... a set of natural
> numbers?
>
> Do you get a faint idea meanwhile, what actual infinity implies?


It certainly implies that you are an idiot. But that is not our problem.