Date: Mar 20, 2013 5:32 PM
Author: Ralf Bader
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
WM wrote:

> On 20 Mrz., 22:11, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> On Mar 20, 10:01 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>>

>> > It cannot contain a necessary line, since, as you said, there is no

>> > necessary line.

>> > But you think that it necessarily must contain a not necessary line.

>>

>> Correct. However, this not necessary line can be any line.

>>

>> > If so, then at least one line is necessary.

>>

>> No, knowing that you need one line does not mean you need

>> one particular line.

>

> You cannot know that you need one line, because every chice can be

> disproved.

>>

>> <snip>

>>

>> > > A set of needed lines exists.

>>

>> > Name the first line.

>>

>> One set of needed lines that exists is line 2,3,4,6,7,8...

>> The first line is 2.

>

> This set is not a set of needed lines, because 2, 3, and all lines you

> mentioned are not needed lines.

>

> Would you call the set 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, ... a set of natural

> numbers?

>

> Do you get a faint idea meanwhile, what actual infinity implies?

It certainly implies that you are an idiot. But that is not our problem.