Date: Mar 20, 2013 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224
WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 20 Mrz., 22:01, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > Indeed, you have not even given an explanation
> > of *all* that is agreed upon.
> If you don't know the set theoretic meaning of "all natural numbers",
> then you should try to learn it. If you don't know the meaning of
> Cantor's "wohlunterscheidbar" (well-distinguishable) that has to be
> true for all elements of every set, then you should try to learn it.
WM suggesting that others need to learn things, when he daily
demonstrates the unplumbed and unplumbable depths depths of his own
ignorance, is a joke.