Date: Mar 20, 2013 10:25 PM
Author: Virgil
Subject: Re: Matheology � 224

In article 
<7a10030a-42a8-498f-9f82-d4877a2674c8@k14g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 20 Mrz., 22:01, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>

> > Indeed, you have not even given an explanation
> > of *all* that is agreed upon.

>
> If you don't know the set theoretic meaning of "all natural numbers",
> then you should try to learn it. If you don't know the meaning of
> Cantor's "wohlunterscheidbar" (well-distinguishable) that has to be
> true for all elements of every set, then you should try to learn it.
>

WM suggesting that others need to learn things, when he daily
demonstrates the unplumbed and unplumbable depths depths of his own
ignorance, is a joke.
--