Date: Mar 21, 2013 3:06 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 21 Mrz., 01:39, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 3/20/2013 2:57 PM, WM wrote:
>

> > On 20 Mrz., 20:40, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 20, 4:24 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> >>> I show that every line, that is not the last line, is not needed.
>
> >> Nope.  You show that it is not necessary for its contents.
> >> This is not the same as not needed.

>
> > Agreed:
> > I show that every line, that is not the last line, is not needed to
> > remain in the list in order to have its contents in the list.
> > Agreed?

>
> Let
>
> 1, 2, 3
> 6, 7, 8
> 0, 4, 5
>
> be a *finite* list
>
> Then the last line is
>
> 0, 4, 5
>
> The contents of the removed lines
> are not in the last line.


Here you have really made a good point. Now try advance a little bit
further and find out why I dit *not* apply your example. Hint: There
are even two resons.

Regards, WM