Date: Mar 21, 2013 3:08 AM
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 21 Mrz., 02:02, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, WM wrote:
> > On 20 Mrz., 22:01, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> >> Indeed, you have not even given an explanation
> >> of *all* that is agreed upon.
> > If you don't know the set theoretic meaning of "all natural numbers",
> > then you should try to learn it. If you don't know the meaning of
> > Cantor's "wohlunterscheidbar" (well-distinguishable) that has to be
> > true for all elements of every set, then you should try to learn it.
> You should learn what is required when you
> make claims in academic discourse.
And you should be glad to have left academics.