Date: Mar 21, 2013 6:00 AM
Author: Alan Smaill
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:

> On 21 Mrz., 02:02, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>> On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, WM wrote:
>>

>> > On 20 Mrz., 22:01, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> Indeed, you have not even given an explanation
>> >> of *all* that is agreed upon.

>>
>> > If you don't know the set theoretic meaning of "all natural numbers",
>> > then you should try to learn it. If you don't know the meaning of
>> > Cantor's "wohlunterscheidbar" (well-distinguishable) that has to be
>> > true for all elements of every set, then you should try to learn it.

>>
>> You should learn what is required when you
>> make claims in academic discourse.

>
> And you should be glad to have left academics.


And you should be ashamed to disparage someone who
is thinking for himself.


> Regards, WM

--
Alan Smaill