Date: Mar 21, 2013 6:00 AM
Author: Alan Smaill
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:

> On 21 Mrz., 02:02, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

>> On 3/20/2013 4:07 PM, WM wrote:

>>

>> > On 20 Mrz., 22:01, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:

>>

>> >> Indeed, you have not even given an explanation

>> >> of *all* that is agreed upon.

>>

>> > If you don't know the set theoretic meaning of "all natural numbers",

>> > then you should try to learn it. If you don't know the meaning of

>> > Cantor's "wohlunterscheidbar" (well-distinguishable) that has to be

>> > true for all elements of every set, then you should try to learn it.

>>

>> You should learn what is required when you

>> make claims in academic discourse.

>

> And you should be glad to have left academics.

And you should be ashamed to disparage someone who

is thinking for himself.

> Regards, WM

--

Alan Smaill