Date: Mar 22, 2013 2:57 AM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 3/22/2013 1:45 AM, WM wrote:
> On 21 Mrz., 19:39, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>> On 3/21/2013 6:32 AM, WM wrote:
>>
>>
>>

>>> Note: For every finite set of natural numbers, we can look at all
>>> elements, at least in principle.

>>
>> Would you care to prove this for your readers?

>
> No, since it is wrong (at least if sets are considered which have more
> that 10^100 elements). But it is the position of set theory which I do
> apply here in oder to contradict it.



Since your statement implies that you
actually *know* how to use standard
set theory, then you will not hesitate
to provide a *proof* within set theory
according to the established means
that shows it to be inconsistent.

That is your claim.

Now you claim to know the techniques
for proving it.

Please do.