Date: Mar 22, 2013 5:09 AM
Author: mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224

On 22 Mrz., 09:14, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> On 3/22/2013 1:55 AM, WM wrote:
>
>
>
>
>

> > On 21 Mrz., 20:35, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> >> On 3/21/2013 10:11 AM, WM wrote:
>
> >>> Induction does not need time.
>
> >> In
>
> >> news://news.giganews.com:119/f23c81fd-2463-4d3f-8df4-04799a493...@z4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com
>
> >> WM wrote:
>
> >> ================
> >> Everything that is in the list
> >> 1
> >> 1, 2
> >> 1, 2, 3
> >> ...
> >> 1, 2, 3, ..., n
> >> is in the last line. Alas as soon as you try to fix it, it is no
> >> longer the last line.

>
> > The former is the position of set theory, the latter is the correct
> > way of thinking - useful for those who can think.

>
> If you believe that to be the case,
> why will you not explain the details?


Because every intelligent reader has already got it.

Regards, WM