Date: Mar 22, 2013 5:12 AM
Author: fom
Subject: Re: Matheology § 224
On 3/22/2013 3:59 AM, Virgil wrote:

> In article

> <55e35b90-83da-46ef-8e1a-3aa03fbac0d6@k8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,

> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

>

>> My proof shows

>> that every line can be removed from the list without removing any

>> natural number from the list.

>>

>> Regards, WM

>

> Only in WM's wild weird world of WMytheology does anyone claim to be

> able to remove every line/set from a union of lines/sets and still be

> sure of having all of the union still there.

>

It is the psychological intent to concatenate marks

acting in representation of natural numbers that

remains.

Although Brouwer claims affinity with the Kantian

a priori notion of time, that affinity lasts only

one or two paragraphs. It then turns into a discussion

of causal intent by which the objects of the world

are willfully constructed in relation to the "two-ness"

of a priori time. Each trailing element of a given

primitive "two-ness" initiates the next instance of

"two-ness" and another round of causal intent

with its willful construction.

Brouwer, however, was a mathematician who actually

produced mathematics on the basis of such ideas.

WM seems to have taken something similar to this

as his material definition of "proof by reality".